Most political scientists in the U.S. agree that the behavioral revolution of the 1950s and 1960s brought about a sea change in the discipline (Adcock 2007). In the last few decades, however, some have argued that it may not have been so great or sudden a change after all (Drzyek 2006, Farr 1995, and Gunnell 1993). Others, including myself, have tried to pinpoint how political science changed after WW II and when it did so (Adcock 2007 and Hauptmann 2012). Still, whatever one's view of these matters, "behavioralism" (as political scientists came to call the orientation associated with the revolution), remains firmly embedded in the academic study of politics in the U.S. The study of informal institutions and political processes, a loosely positivistic idea of a "value-free" science and the emphasis on the collection and statistical analysis of quantitative data, behavioral commitments all, are part of the deep structure of political science today.
Title: The Development of Philanthropic Interest in the Scientific Study of Political Behavior
Publication date 2011-01-01
Publication Year 2011
Rockefeller Archive Center
North America / United States
Resource provided by IssueLab
IssueLab's Embeddable Widget
Use this super simple form to customize and generate the code you need to display this content in your own environment - no programming required. The feed will inherit more specific styles, like font face and font color, from your website.
Your widget code
Add to the Collection
Please use the form below to provide us with your recommendation, and we'll check it out. Include your name and email address along with your suggestion just in case we need to get in touch. Thank you for contacting us.